CSW is right that Bitcoin is designed for big blocks in data centers.
The real reason is that Bitcoin’s transactions are logically sequential but validate in logarithmic parallel time.
Soon we will learn team Ethereum was wrong for giving up on UTXO.
But CSW is wrong to say that Bitcoin provides the same capabilities as Ethereum, no matter how much he insists we don’t understand his team’s techniques.
He will show you oracle solutions to the entire class of problems that requires L1 context which Bitcoin does not provide.
He may even question why you wish to remove the requirement for an oracle’s signature for a given application.
Let him do what he wants. We owe him some gratitude.